Phil Whetton
Health Report
A metabolic age of 54 vs chronological 73 is a staggering 26% reduction. Philip's body metabolises like someone nearly two decades younger — placing him in the top 5% for his age group. This is truly exceptional.
62.2 kg of muscle at age 73 is extraordinary. Average muscle mass for a 73-year-old male is ~42–48 kg. Philip has significantly more muscle than virtually all peers, placing him in the top 3%.
At 17.7%, Philip is well within the healthy range (13–20% for men 70–79) and leaner than approximately 90% of UK men his age, where average body fat is 30–35%. An outstanding result.
A rating of 9 is well within the healthy range (1–12). Average for UK men 70–79 is 12–16, placing Philip ahead of 70% of his peers. The only area with room for improvement — targeting ≤5 would be optimal.
At 22.3, Philip sits comfortably in the healthy range. Average BMI for UK men 70–79 is ~28. Philip is leaner than 90% of his peers — and unlike many with low BMI, his is supported by exceptional muscle mass, not low weight.
3.1 kg bone mass is well within the optimal range for Philip's weight and age. Bone density typically declines with age, but his levels indicate strong skeletal health — likely supported by consistent physical activity and good nutrition.
62.2 kg of muscle mass at age 73 is truly outstanding. Sarcopenia (age-related muscle loss) typically reduces muscle mass by 3–8% per decade after 30. Philip has maintained muscle well above age-adjusted averages, placing him in the top 3% nationally. This is the foundation of his remarkable metabolic age and the single most impressive metric on the scan.
A metabolic age of 54 at chronological 73 means Philip's metabolism functions like someone 19 years younger. This is one of the most impressive metabolic age results we have seen. Combined with his exceptional muscle mass, this indicates a body that is ageing exceptionally well. Reducing visceral fat from 9 to 5 could potentially push metabolic age into the high 40s.
At 9, visceral fat is within the healthy range (1–12) but above the optimal zone of 1–5. This is the only area where meaningful improvement can be made. Reducing refined carbohydrates, increasing cardiovascular exercise (brisk walking, cycling), and maintaining a modest caloric deficit could bring this to ≤5 within 3–6 months, further reducing metabolic disease risk.
At 17.7%, Philip's body fat is well within the optimal range for men aged 70–79 (13–20%). This is dramatically lower than the average of 30–35% for his age group. The combination of high muscle mass and low body fat is the hallmark of exceptional physical conditioning and indicates consistent, long-term commitment to health and fitness.
The overall body composition is excellently balanced: 79.5% lean mass, 17.7% fat mass, and 3.96% bone mass. These ratios are what we would expect from someone in their mid-50s, not a 73-year-old. Philip demonstrates that age is not a barrier to maintaining an exceptional physique with the right lifestyle approach.
Philip's body composition profile represents the gold standard for what is achievable at 73. Every major metric — weight, BMI, body fat, muscle mass, bone mass, hydration, and metabolic age — is either in the optimal or excellent range. This is the profile we show to other clients as evidence of what a commitment to health can achieve at any age.
Philip's body composition at age 73 is exceptional by any standard. His extraordinary muscle mass (top 3%), metabolic age 19 years younger than chronological, healthy BMI, optimal body fat, excellent hydration, and strong bone density combine to create a profile that most people half his age would envy. The only minor area for improvement is visceral fat (from 9 to ≤5). This is the aspirational standard.
This body composition analysis is just the starting point. We're building a comprehensive health intelligence platform for our clients that brings together all of your health data in one place — giving you a complete picture of your health and a clear roadmap to optimise it.
